Works by Ikegami, T. (exact spelling)

5 found
Order:
  1. Undecidability in the imitation game.Y. Sato & T. Ikegami - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (2):133-43.
    This paper considers undecidability in the imitation game, the so-called Turing Test. In the Turing Test, a human, a machine, and an interrogator are the players of the game. In our model of the Turing Test, the machine and the interrogator are formalized as Turing machines, allowing us to derive several impossibility results concerning the capabilities of the interrogator. The key issue is that the validity of the Turing test is not attributed to the capability of human or machine, but (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2. The occurring fact in the japanese way of thinking+ and language.T. Ikegami - 1985 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 92 (1):123-124.
  3. The Self-moving Oil Droplet as a Homeostat.T. Ikegami - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):114-114.
    Open peer commentary on the article “Homeostats for the 21st Century? Simulating Ashby Simulating the Brain” by Stefano Franchi. Upshot: Using the example of chemical oil droplets, the paper discusses the idea of a homeostat in terms of a default mode network.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Authors' Response: From Bodily Extension to Bodily Incorporation.Y. Sato, H. Iizuka & T. Ikegami - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):89-92.
    Upshot: In the model simulation and the human experiment, we observed that attention shifted from a tool to a task. This was accompanied by bodily extension. However, our experiments lack a sense of bodily incorporation (the sense of ownership. Based on the valuable commentaries, we would like to discuss the necessary conditions for possible bodily incorporation in terms of redundant degrees of freedom, synchronous visual tactile stimulation, and 1/f noise.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Investigating Extended Embodiment Using a Computational Model and Human Experimentation.Y. Sato, H. Iizuka & T. Ikegami - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):73-84.
    Context: Our body schema is not restricted to biological body boundaries (such as the skin), as can be seen in the use of a cane by a person who is visually impaired or the “rubber hands” experiment. The tool becomes a part of the body schema when the focus of our attention is shifted from the tool to the task to be performed. Problem: A body schema is formed through interactions among brain, body, tool, and environment. Nevertheless, the dynamic mechanisms (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark